Skip to main content
SWStudyWalks Search

Tech in Surgery Prep / Unit 13   TSC 322 review, 2 to 3 minutes

A Missing Retractor Blade

Captions available

The idea

A worked example, constructed for this course, follows a closing instrument count that is missing one part of a self-retaining retractor.

In practice

At the first layer of closure in an abdominal case, the scrub person, Morgan, and the circulating nurse count instruments against the tray list. The Balfour retractor has come out of the wound and lies on the back table, but one of its blades is not with it. The count is short one item. Morgan says so at once, and the circulating nurse announces it to the surgeon, who pauses the closure. They recount: still missing. The circulating nurse tells the operating room supervisor, as policy requires. The surgeon looks carefully in the wound, along the edges and under the abdominal wall where the blade sat. Morgan checks the Mayo stand, the back table, and under the drapes near the patient's side. The circulator checks the floor and the linen. Then the surgeon finds it: the blade had detached and slipped under the edge of the incision, between the abdominal wall and the drape. It is removed and placed with the rest of the retractor. The count is repeated, and it is now correct. The circulating nurse documents the discrepancy, where the blade was found, and that the count was reconciled before closure. At the debrief, the team notes that the blade's locking screw was loose, and the retractor is sent for repair.

Where people slip

Multi-part instruments come apart, which is why each part is counted on its own. The count found the blade because it was listed as a separate item; counted as one whole retractor, it could have stayed behind while everyone believed the instrument had been returned.

Your place on the trail

Every lesson rests on earlier ones and opens later ones. Tap any to jump.

Something wrong in this lesson? Flag it  ·  Sources for Tech in Surgery Prep