Skip to main content
SWStudyWalks Search

Evidence-Based Practice   EBP 3616 review, 2 to 3 minutes

The Change Stalls at Fifteen Percent

Captions available

The idea

The technique: read a stalled adoption curve correctly, and decide whether slow uptake is a failure or the expected shape of a change in progress.

In practice

Four months in, the sepsis bundle is being used by about fifteen percent of eligible staff, and the executive sponsor wants to know why it failed. Diffusion of innovations says it has not failed. Adoption runs through innovators and early adopters before it reaches the majority, and a critical mass of roughly fifteen to twenty percent is where a change either takes hold or does not — so this is the threshold rather than the ceiling. The change curve says the same thing from the emotional side: the preparation stage is dangerous because of its length, and the implementation stage is where the emotion attaches to the reason for the change. The response is therefore not to escalate. Target the receptive rather than the sceptics, because effort spent converting laggards is effort not spent consolidating the majority — and laggards have reasons, often good ones about workload the plan ignored. Mentors carry the next phase. The measurement changes too: adoption rate becomes the outcome, and the time to the next decile becomes the process measure. Reporting both to the sponsor replaces a conversation about whether the project failed with one about how fast it is moving, which is the question the data can actually answer.

Where people slip

Slow adoption is not the same as failure, and the instinct to win over the sceptics first inverts what the evidence says. Expect the pattern rather than reacting to it. What would justify concern is a curve that has stopped moving entirely, which is a different observation from one that is moving slowly.

Your place on the trail

Every lesson rests on earlier ones and opens later ones. Tap any to jump.

Something wrong in this lesson? Flag it  ·  Sources for Evidence-Based Practice