Social Sciences and History / Unit 9 SSH 0829 worked example, 60 to 90 seconds
Normative Against Empirical: Classifying a Question
The idea
The exam gives a question or claim and asks whether it is normative or empirical, the outline's methods item, and the anchor's two sections define the split. Normative political science, also called political philosophy, asks about the meaning, purposes and goals of politics, what a good citizen is, what governments should serve; its answers come from reason and logic, not evidence alone, through three approaches: consequences, rules, or virtue. Empirical political science tests hypotheses on evidence, asking how the political world actually works and how politicians actually behave. It rests on facts, what can be counted, measured and verified, and yields generalizations, statements typically true though not for every case, probabilistic rather than deterministic, which describe, explain and predict.
In practice
Given "governments ought to protect natural rights", normative, a rules approach. Given "the purpose of the state is to make citizens virtuous", normative, virtue. Given "turnout rises with education", empirical, a generalization. Given "incumbents win about nine times in ten", empirical and probabilistic. Given "a good policy is one that produces the most benefit", normative, consequences. Ask whether the sentence says should or does.
Where people slip
The trap is treating empirical claims as certain; the anchor's scientists are tentative and expect revision. The second trap is dismissing normative work as opinion; the anchor calls it systematic study by reason.
Your place on the trail
Every lesson rests on earlier ones and opens later ones. Tap any to jump.
Something wrong in this lesson? Flag it