Principles of Macroeconomics / Unit 17 MAC 1611 review, 2 to 3 minutes
Why Similar Countries Trade the Same Goods
The idea
Comparative advantage predicts that trade happens between economies that are different from each other, and a large share of the world's trade is between economies that are very similar, often in the same industry — countries exporting and importing cars at the same time. That is a genuine puzzle for the model as stated, and the resolution is not that the model is wrong but that it is incomplete. Two further sources of gain operate alongside it. The first is specialisation and learning: goods are not homogeneous, and firms working on particular products develop particular skills, so one country exports one kind of machinery and imports another without either workforce being generally better. The second is economies of scale: average cost falls as output rises, up to a point, so a larger market supports lower costs. Neither of these requires the two countries to differ at all.
In practice
Worked example, the argument that decides it. Take a small economy and one product where average cost keeps falling until a plant serves a market far larger than that country. Without trade, one or two plants could supply the whole domestic market at the lowest available cost — and the country's consumers would then face almost no competition and almost no choice. Open it to trade and both problems dissolve at once: production runs at efficient scale, because the market is now the world rather than the country, and consumers face many producers instead of one or two. Scale and variety normally trade off against each other inside a closed economy. Trade is what lets an economy have both, and the anchor credits foreign competition with much of the improvement in domestic car quality.
Where people slip
Three cautions. First, economies of scale are not unlimited: the cost curve flattens beyond some output, and the anchor's own diagram shows the flat stretch, so "bigger is cheaper" stops being true at some scale. Second, this changes what is traded. When the stages of making one good happen in different countries — design in one, components in another, assembly in a third — trade is increasingly in parts rather than finished goods, and the question of where something was made stops having a single answer. Third, and this is what carries into the rest of the unit, an advantage built from learning and scale can be built and can also be lost. Comparative advantage grounded in climate or ore is fixed; comparative advantage grounded in accumulated skill is not, which is the honest opening for the infant-industry argument at 1625. *All of this rests on the anchor alone.*
Your place on the trail
Every lesson rests on earlier ones and opens later ones. Tap any to jump.
Something wrong in this lesson? Flag it · Sources for Principles of Macroeconomics