Skip to main content
SWStudyWalks Search

Disseminating Evidence

The narration between entries paraphrases; it never reads an entry aloud before the entry plays. Every entry in this lecture plays exactly as it does on its own page — same file, same speed, nothing laid over it.

What you can do after this

  1. Say why work is disseminated at all
  2. Say what a talk offers that a poster does not, and the reverse
  3. Name the five properties of a policy brief
  4. Say what decides which dissemination form to use
  5. Say why more evidence does not make a stronger brief

What it covers

39 entries in 8 topics. Each number links to that entry on its own.

  1. 1. Step six, and why

  2. 2. Speaking

  3. 3. The poster

  4. 4. Publishing

  5. 5. The brief, and the audience

  6. 6. The three canonical errors

  7. 7. The work, delivered

  8. 8. The media, and rounds

Check yourself

Why is work disseminated at all?

So the next unit facing the same problem does not repeat work that has already been done. It is a numbered step of the process, not an optional extra — and professional advancement, while real, is a by-product rather than the reason.

What does a talk offer that a poster does not, and the reverse?

A talk allows questions, which is where a presentation is actually tested, so it suits work whose method needs defending. A poster is read without you present and stands for the length of the conference, reaching people who would never have attended your session.

What are the five properties of a policy brief?

The issue stated plainly before any evidence. Only the evidence bearing on the ask. Built so it can be skimmed. Short enough to be finished. And links and contacts for the reader who wants more.

What decides which dissemination form to use?

The audience, decided before anything is written. Who needs this work determines the form, the length and the language — and health literacy is part of understanding the audience rather than a courtesy added at the end.

Why does more evidence not make a stronger brief?

Because it makes a longer one, and length is what stops a brief being finished. A brief nobody finishes has not been read, so the additional evidence reduced its effect rather than increasing it. Focus is the strength.

Lecture transcript

The narration as recorded, in order. Where an entry plays, the transcript links to it rather than reprinting it — the entry plays from its own file, unaltered, and says the same thing on its own page.

This is step six, the last of the seven, and the one most often treated as optional by people who completed the other six. The reason it is not optional is plain: if you found something and never shared it, the next unit facing the same problem does the same work again. Every hour of it. That is the argument — professional advancement is a by-product, and a real one, but it is not why the step exists. By the end you can say why work is disseminated; say what a talk offers that a poster does not and the reverse; name the five properties of a policy brief; say what decides which form to use; and say why more evidence does not make a brief stronger.

Two videos. The reason work gets shared is that the next unit facing this problem should not have to repeat it — professional advancement is a by-product rather than the point.

The last of the seven steps.

EBP 3001 Step Six, Reached

Dissemination is the sixth step, and reaching it means the other six were done.

Why any of this is shared.

EBP 3002 Why Work Gets Shared

So the next unit facing this problem does not repeat the work. That is the reason, and professional advancement is a by-product.

Four videos on presenting to a room. A talk allows questions, which suits work whose method needs defending — and the questions are where a presentation is actually tested.

The first form.

EBP 3003 The Podium Presentation

A talk to a room, which allows questions and therefore suits work whose method needs defending.

A variant of it.

EBP 3004 The Panel Presentation

Several speakers on one topic, which reaches an audience none of them would have drawn alone.

What makes one work.

EBP 3005 What a Panel Depends On

A panel depends on the speakers having coordinated, or it becomes three talks that happen to share a room.

The preparation that matters.

EBP 3006 Anticipate the Questions

Work out in advance what will be asked, because the questions are where a presentation is actually tested.

Six videos. A poster is read without you present and stands for the length of a conference, where a talk is over when the session ends. Whether someone stops is decided in about two seconds.

The second form.

EBP 3007 The Poster Presentation

A visual summary standing on its own, read without you present.

Its first rule.

EBP 3008 Legible From a Distance

It has to be readable from a few feet away, which constrains how much can go on it.

The craft of making one.

EBP 3009 Layout and Materials

Layout and materials decide whether someone stops, and the decision is made in about two seconds.

A small practical note.

EBP 3010 Stand to the Side

Stand beside the poster rather than in front of it, so people can read without negotiating with you.

What to leave behind.

EBP 3011 Leave a Way to Be Reached

Leave contact details, because the useful conversations happen after the session.

The advantage people overlook.

EBP 3012 Posters Are Displayed Longer

A poster stands for the length of a conference; a talk is over when the session ends.

Five videos. Deciding what to publish is a question about who needs it rather than about how much you have, and authorship is settled before the writing rather than negotiated after.

The judgement to make.

EBP 3013 Deciding What to Publish

Deciding what is worth publishing, which is a question about who needs it rather than about how much you have.

The forms available.

EBP 3014 More Than One Way to Publish

Journals are not the only route, and different routes reach different readers.

The process it goes through.

EBP 3015 Peer Review

Review by others in the field before publication, which is what a reader is relying on when they trust a journal.

A variant of it.

EBP 3016 Blind Review

Review where identities are withheld, to keep the judgement on the work.

Who gets named.

EBP 3017 Authorship

Who counts as an author, settled before the writing rather than negotiated after it.

Eight videos. The policy brief returns from unit 20 as a dissemination form, with five properties — and then the rule that governs every choice in this unit: the audience is decided before anything is written.

Unit 20's form, returning.

EBP 3018 The Health Policy Brief, Again

The policy brief appears again here as a dissemination form, which is why unit 20 taught it.

Its first property.

EBP 3019 The Issue Is Stated Plainly

The issue comes first and in plain language, before any evidence.

Its second.

EBP 3020 The Evidence Is Focused

Only the evidence bearing on the ask, rather than everything found.

Its third.

EBP 3021 It Can Be Skimmed

Built so someone can extract the argument without reading every line.

Its fourth.

EBP 3022 It Is Short

Short enough to be finished, because a brief that is not finished has not been read.

Its fifth.

EBP 3023 Links and Contacts

A route to the full evidence and to you, for the reader who wants more.

The rule governing all of it.

EBP 3024 Understand the Target Audience

Every choice of form follows from who needs the work, which is decided before anything is written.

A part of understanding them.

EBP 3025 Health Literacy

What the audience can read and use, which is part of understanding them rather than a courtesy added afterwards.

Three videos. The first is structural — dissemination is a numbered step, and skipping it means someone else repeats work that is already done.

The first error, and the structural one.

EBP 3026 Misconception: Dissemination Is Optional

It is a numbered step of the process. Skipping it means the next unit repeats work that has already been done.

The second.

EBP 3027 Misconception: A Poster Is a Shrunken Paper

A poster is a different form with different constraints. A paper reduced to poster size is legible to nobody.

The third.

EBP 3028 Misconception: More Evidence Makes a Stronger Brief

More evidence makes a longer brief, and length is what stops it being finished. Focus is the strength.

One procedure choosing the form from the audience.

The unit assembled.

EBP 3029 Getting the Work to the People Who Need It

One finished project disseminated by the form its audience needs, with the audience decided first.

Ten videos closing the unit, and they exist because a re-shot title page revealed an objective this course was not serving. The chapter is titled Presentations, Publications, Health Policy Briefs, and the Media — and until now the unit covered the first three. The discipline of the whole strand is in one entry: say only what the evidence supports, and decline the stronger claim a reporter offers you as a question.

A fourth channel this unit has not mentioned.

EBP 3031 The Fourth Channel

Beyond presentations, publications and briefs, the chapter names the news media — which reaches people no professional channel does.

Who is allowed to answer.

EBP 3032 Who Speaks for the Work

Organisations designate who speaks to media for them, so a clinician approached directly routes the request rather than answering.

The whole preparation, in one instruction.

EBP 3033 Prepare Three Points

Decide three points in advance, each able to stand alone, because an interview is edited by someone else.

Who is actually listening.

EBP 3034 A Lay Audience, Not a Professional One

Use the language of health literacy, and replace a term that would need defining rather than defining it.

A term the chapter names.

EBP 3035 Embargo

An agreement that a finding will not be reported before an agreed time, so publication and coverage are coordinated.

The discipline of the whole strand.

EBP 3036 Do Not Outrun the Evidence

Say only what the evidence supports, at the certainty it carries — and decline the stronger claim a reporter offers as a question.

Dissemination inside the organisation.

EBP 3037 Evidence-Based Clinical Rounds

Working a real case at the bedside with the evidence in hand — few people, reached deeply, which is the opposite trade from media.

A structure for those sessions.

EBP 3038 The BOPPPS Model

Bridge-in, objectives, pre-assessment, participatory learning, post-assessment, summary — and the assessments are what make it evaluable.

The error this strand ends on.

EBP 3039 Misconception: Coverage Means Impact

A story appearing is reach, and reach is a process measure. It is unit 10's error arriving in a new setting.

The strand assembled.

EBP 3040 Taking a Finding to a Lay Audience

One finding carried to a general audience with the request routed, three standalone points prepared, and the claim held at its actual certainty.

That is step six. Against the outcomes. Work is shared so the next unit facing this problem does not repeat it. Dissemination is a numbered step of the process rather than an optional extra for people who enjoy conferences. A talk allows questions, which is where a presentation is genuinely tested, so it suits work whose method needs defending. A poster is read without you and stands for the whole conference — reaching people who would never have attended your session. A policy brief states the issue plainly before any evidence, carries only the evidence bearing on the ask, can be skimmed, is short enough to be finished, and leaves links and contacts. Every one of those choices follows from the audience, decided before anything is written — and health literacy is part of understanding that audience rather than a courtesy extended afterwards. And more evidence does not make a stronger brief. It makes a longer one, and length is exactly what stops it being finished. A brief that is not finished has not been read at all. Unit 22 turns to generating evidence where none exists.

This is free, and stays free. If it helped, here is what keeps it running.