Ethics and Values / Unit 7 Ethics 329 worked example, 60 to 90 seconds
Ranking Without a Ruler
The idea
Ranking without a ruler handles a value conflict in five steps: name the values at stake, sort intrinsic from instrumental, test each option against each value, take any dominant option, and otherwise judge with reasons stated aloud.
In practice
A family weighs moving for a promotion. Step one, name the values: the parent's work, the children's stability, income, nearness to grandparents. Step two, sort: income is instrumental — it serves the others and gets no vote of its own beyond that service; stability and the grandparents are close to intrinsic here. Step three, the grid: option stay scores high on stability and family, flat on work; option move scores high on work and income's services, low on the rest. Step four, dominance: neither option wins on every value — no free verdict. Step five, judge aloud: "the children's next three years outweigh the career's next step, and the step will come again" is a ranking with reasons — challengeable, revisable, and honest about what it trades. The method never found a ruler; it found something better, a record of the weighing.
Where people slip
Skipping step five's saying-aloud turns judgment back into mood.
Your place on the trail
Every lesson rests on earlier ones and opens later ones. Tap any to jump.
Something wrong in this lesson? Flag it · Sources for Ethics and Values