Skip to main content
SWStudyWalks Search

Principles of Macroeconomics / Unit 3   MAC 0224 review, 2 to 3 minutes

What GDP Does and Does Not Tell You

Captions available

The idea

GDP measures the market value of what a country produces, and it does that well. What it does not measure is how well people live, and the gap runs in both directions. It understates well-being in several ways. It counts no leisure, so a country that works fewer hours for the same output looks worse rather than better. It counts spending rather than outcomes, so it registers what is spent on health and schooling but not whether people are healthier or better educated. It misses the value of new products and of greater variety. And it ignores everything produced outside a market, which is a large share of activity and a larger share in poorer countries. It also overstates well-being. It counts spending forced on people by things going wrong: rebuilding after a storm, replacing what was stolen, treating what made people ill. It says nothing about who receives the income, since a per capita figure is an average. And some apparent growth is production moving from the household into the market rather than new production at all.

In practice

Worked example: two countries report the same GDP per capita. In the first, people work fifty hours a week, most meals are bought, crime is high enough that households spend heavily on security, and the income is concentrated in a tenth of the population. In the second, people work thirty-five hours, much food is grown and cooked at home, spending on security is negligible, and income is spread evenly. The measured figures are identical. Almost nobody, shown the two descriptions, would call the countries equally well off, and the second is systematically undercounted because its household production never reaches a market.

Where people slip

None of this makes GDP useless, and the opposite error is as common as the first. GDP per capita moves together with most other measures of living standards: countries with more of it tend to have longer lives, more schooling, less child mortality and cleaner water. It is a rough measure that is usually right about direction, and there is no single better number. The honest position is the one to carry forward: use GDP to answer the question it answers, which is how much was produced, and reach for other measures when the question is how well people live. Every later unit in this course uses real GDP for exactly that reason, and every one of them inherits these limits.

Your place on the trail

Every lesson rests on earlier ones and opens later ones. Tap any to jump.

Something wrong in this lesson? Flag it  ·  Sources for Principles of Macroeconomics