Indirect Proof
This video presents the same text shown beside it, spoken and on screen. It adds nothing the text does not say.
State
To prove p: assume ~p, derive a contradiction (q · ~q), then discharge — p exits to the main line.
Show
If denying it explodes, it's true. Video 140's totality, weaponized.
Watch for
Any explicit contradiction ends the sub-proof — it needn't involve p. The absurdity is the point, not its subject.